Skip to main content

The showing of Simone Bitton's film, Rachel, at the Castro theater in San Francisco on July 25, 2009, as part of the Jewish Film Festival, was a landmark event in changing attitudes toward Israel.  Although the film itself is deserving of the attention given to it by both the press and the public, the real story was audience itself.

Around 1000 people attended the showing of the film.  The line of theater-goers went around the block.  I and my two companions were unable to find three seats together in the 1400-seat theater, and we were by no means the last in line.  (The balcony went largely unused for some reason).  People were actually standing in the aisles.  It was the largest audience I have seen at any film festival.  Attendees came from as far away as Sacramento and perhaps farther.

My first thought was that the supporters of Israel had turned out in force.  In an unprecedented decision for any film, Michael Harris of San Francisco Voice for Israel had been given five minutes to speak at the beginning, to raise his objections.  Perhaps he had turned out a lot of his community to drown out Palestinian rights advocates.

I was wrong.  As Michael began to speak of Israel's right to defend itself, the misguided motives of Rachel, the "other Rachels" and all the other tired arguments against the film, the audience audibly moaned, then began to raise its own objections, punctuating Michael's every phrase louder and louder.  At that point, the festival organizer stepped in to ask the audience to be more tolerant and pointed out that Rachel's mother, Cindy, who would be speaking at the end of the film, deserved such courtesy, as well.

The audience settled back into subdued groans for a few phrases, but when Michael accused Jewish Voice for Peace and the American Friends Service Committee of being backers of terrorism, the audience erupted into applause at the mention of each name.  It's a good thing it wasn't traditional Yiddish theater, where the audience armed itself with tomatoes.  Anyone but Harris would have been humiliated by the experience.

The concern for respectful treatment of Cindy Corrie's presentation at the end of the film was also unwarranted.  The audence was so completely supportive of her, her daughter and Palestinian rights that there was not a hint of the hateful messages with which the organizers had been deluged prior to the showing.

It was astonishing.  Although the audience was by no means all Jewish, a large number clearly were, and the sense of many of the attendees was that their relative immunity from the charge of anti-Semitism gave them license to be more vocal.

The significance of the event was unmistakable.  We were witnessing a major shift in attitudes toward Israel, even (or especially) within the Jewish community.  The rose-colored glasses were coming off, and Israel was clearly no longer immune from standards to which other nations had long been held.

To keep things in perspective, community attitudes are far from being reversed.  It's hard to believe that this audience represents even a majority of the community from which it comes.  However, for it to be so dominant and numerous in this setting is something of a milestone, and potentially constitutes something of a sea change in the way Israel is perceived.

Take heed.  The "other" view of Israel is now respectable.

Originally posted to Another Paul in Berkeley on Tue Jul 28, 2009 at 03:26 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site