Skip to main content

On June 1st, a article about Congresswoman Donna Edwards (MD-04), "Should Edwards be shvitzing?", was published.  The article states that there are some members within her district's Jewish Community that are not pleased with her stance on Israel.  As a result, there is speculation that these constituents may try to back a primary challenger whose positions on Israel are more in line with former Congressman Al Wynn.

In the last few weeks, AIPAC backed a Congressional letter that was signed by 329 House members, including 29 of its 31 Jewish members.  Of this last group, only Congressmen Barney Frank (MA-04) and Bob Filner (CA-51) did not sign the letter.  Reps. Edwards and Filner did, however, sign a recent J Street-backed letter to the President supporting strong U.S. leadership in pursuing a negotiated two-state resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, as well as a comprehensive regional peace.

Each of these Representatives was endorsed by J Street's Political Action Committee (JStreetPAC) in the 2008 elections.  From the J Street PAC website:

JStreetPAC is the first and only federal Political Action Committee established to explicitly promote meaningful American leadership to end the Israeli-Palestinian and Israeli-Arab conflicts peacefully and diplomatically.

The PAC's goal is to demonstrate that there is meaningful political and financial support available to candidates for federal office from large numbers of Americans who believe a new direction in American policy will advance U.S. interests in the Middle East and promote real peace and security for Israel and the region.

Here are J Street's comments about these three officials:

Congresswoman Donna Edwards-

Her positions on Israel and the Middle East are closely aligned with JStreetPAC's positions. During her primary campaign against Al Wynn, Edwards ran on an anti-Iraq war platform, having opposed the war from the start. Her website states that "the U.S. should not cease in its efforts to achieve a two-state solution in which Israel's neighbors recognize Israel's right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state, living in security alongside an independent and autonomous Palestinian state" and that "resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict should be pursued in parallel to diplomatic engagement that must take place with Iran, Syria and Arab allies." She also believes that "Israel and the United States share a common bond based on common values."

JStreetPAC was happy to have Donna Edwards in our first group of candidate endorsements and we were excited to welcome her to Congress in 2009.

Congressman Barney Frank-

On the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Rep. Frank is a leader in the House of Representatives.  He was a signatory to the 2007 Ackerman-Boustany letter that endorsed the Annapolis peace conference, and he also disagreed with the recent Iran resolution because of the language it contained that could be construed as urging a blockade.  He has also been very critical of his House colleagues for not giving President Bush the freedom he requested to grant direct economic aid to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.

Rep. Frank is no stranger to the debate surrounding Middle East policy.  He has been critical of the practice common in Washington which labels anyone critical of Israel as not being "pro-Israel," such as when he told Congress the following in February 2005:

"Criticism of specific policies of any Israeli Government, at any given time, in no way implies that someone is anti-Israel, much less anti-Semitic.  Indeed, if people want to hear at any given time, vigorous, even virulent criticisms of the Israeli Government in power, go to the Knesset, go to Israel.  [...]  There is certainly nothing remotely anti- Israel about being critical, any more than my saying that I deplore the Iraq War and I feel every day that I was right to vote against it.  I do not think that makes me anti-American.  And I do not think it makes me anti-Israel to say that some aspects of the occupation were wrong."

Rep. Frank is a strong supporter of diplomacy in the region, exemplified by a letter he wrote to recent Israeli Prime Minister Olmert expressing his admiration for Olmert's initiative in negotiating with the Syrians.  He has also been critical of Israeli settlements, and in that same letter urged Olmert to understand "that to the extent that it appears that settlements are being maintained contrary to the needs of a peace agreement, Israel suffers a loss of support within the United States."

JStreetPAC was proud to endorse Rep. Barney Frank, a brave and dedicated advocate for Middle East peace.

Congressman Bob Filner-

As a young man, he was inspired by the legacy of his father, who, in World War II, participated in liberating the Nazi concentration camps. Bob says of his father, "having viewed such painful and flagrant suffering, he became an advocate for all human rights and a strong supporter of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. He understood the devastation that is caused by discrimination and hatred, and he decided to do everything in his power to stop the spread of prejudice. I was fortunate to grow up under his positive influence, and I am proud that many Jews, and many Americans of all faiths, share his love of freedom and equality."  He demonstrated this belief at a young age, spending months in a Mississippi State Penitentiary at age 18 for being a "Freedom Rider" in the Civil Rights Movement.

A strong Jewish progressive in the House of Representatives, Congressman Filner is also a robust critic of American foreign policy and stalwart advocate for Middle East peace. A distant cousin of former Israeli Prime Minister and current Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, he has spent extensive time touring the Middle East, visiting Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Morocco and Tunisia. During the 2006 war with Hezbollah, he was one of only 28 Democratic Members of Congress – and the only Jewish Member – to courageously sign a resolution calling for a cease-fire in that conflict. He also signed the 2007 Ackerman-Boustany letter that supported the Annapolis Peace Conference.

On Iraq, Congressman Filner voted against the Iraq war resolution and has both actively tried to end that conflict and demanded accountability in its execution. He introduced a bill to eliminate mercenary training camps, supported a bill to end the use of private security firms in Iraq, and attended a protest against Blackwater. As deeply as he opposes the war, he is equally strong in favor of veterans’ rights. As Chairman of the House Veterans’ Affairs Committee, he introduced the "GI Bill for the 21st Century" in June.

J Street was proud to endorse this established champion for Middle East peace for reelection to Congress.

It is extremely important for people who want to move away from the "status-quo" with respect to the Israeli/Palestinian and Israeli/Arab conflicts to offer political and financial support to those officials and candidates by donating to their campaigns.

To donate to these officials, or any other worthy candidates, go to this JStreet PAC page and place the names of the candidates in the comment section.  This will ensure that the entire donation gets to that person.

It is also important to come to Washington D.C. between October 25th and 28th for J Street's First National Conference: "Driving Change, Securing Peace".  There will be educational seminars, panel discussions, and Congressional lobbying for a just resolution to the Middle East conflicts.  You can learn more about the conference and register at this page.

Hat Tip:

I originally mentioned that Rep. Frank signed the J Street supported letter.  In fact, he did not.  In his reaction to the AIPAC-backed letter, he wrote a letter directly to President Obama. His letter supported certain elements of that Congressional letter, but stated his problem with the statement "the proven best way forward is to work closely and privately together both on areas of agreement and especially on areas of disagreement".
I apologize for the mistake.

Originally posted to rbguy on Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 07:02 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (13+ / 0-)

    Thanks for the support.

    Please donate to these officials and join J Street in D.C. this October.

    By the way, the Atlantic just published a story about the recent J Street and AIPAC letters.  You can read it here.

    •  Question: what in the AIPAC letter did you find (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      so objectionable?

      "Democratic Luntz is a prized blogger here." "You're like the chief of constables of the diary police."

      by DemocraticLuntz on Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 07:14:00 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Was it the "viable Palestinian state living side (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:

        by side with the Jewish state of Israel?"

        "Democratic Luntz is a prized blogger here." "You're like the chief of constables of the diary police."

        by DemocraticLuntz on Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 07:14:40 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  More likely the "none of this is Israel's (4+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          sofia, bigchin, rossl, rbguy

          fault" stuff.  From the AIPAC letter, one would think that the only flaw in past US policy is that it hasn't been sufficiently supportive of whatever Israel decides to do.

          That said, the AIPAC letter isn't all that bad.  Much better than the troglodytes chez Mort Klein.

          "[R]ather high-minded, if not a bit self-referential"--The Washington Post.

          by Geekesque on Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 07:26:46 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

      •  From Yglesias (5+ / 0-)

        "[T]he substance of this letter is to try to make people think there will be a domestic price to be paid for any serious effort to push for a solution." - LINK

        Yglesias links to Rosenberg who has more to say on the substance of the AIPAC letter.

      •  Thanks for the question (7+ / 0-)

        In reading the AIPAC-backed letter, I feel that there is a problem with the statement "the proven best way forward is to work closely and privately together both on areas of agreement and especially on areas of disagreement".  I would have to agree with Congressman Frank's assessment, which can be found at this Capital J post.

        I also read (or interpret) recommendation #3 as a need for the Palestinians to stop certain actions before any negotiations can begin, and recommendation #4 as a desire for improved relations from Arab-states prior to any continued negotiations.  In my opinion, it puts all of the responsibilites/preconditions on the Palestinians and Arab-states while not putting any responsibilites/preconditions on the Israeli government.  I just don't think that these are fair or realistic ideas.

      •  same reason as Barney, Donna and Bob (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        rossl, rbguy

        and I must say that, after the disgraceful way he's handled matters economic, it's about time Barney did something wise.

        "History is a tragedy, not a melodrama." - I.F.Stone

        by bigchin on Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 08:54:17 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  A big difference as I read them was on how the (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        rossl, rbguy

        dispute should be aired and debated, openly in the case of J Street, or privately in the case of AIPAC.  

        It's time to be open about this debate and let the general public see the machinations.

        "Peace be the journey. Cool Runnings!"

        by Terra Mystica on Thu Jun 04, 2009 at 06:24:20 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  The problem with public negotiations (0+ / 0-)

          Is that every time someone puts forth an idea, it's going to be picked apart relentlessly by those people that don't like it.  Imagine the Palestinian and Israeli negotiators sitting at a conference table on stage in a big auditorium.  The Palestinian negotiator says "I think there's a likelihood we can accept compensation in lieu of actual resettlement of refugees in Israel."  Suddenly half the auditorium erupts from its seats, booing, throwing tomatoes and rubbish at the Palestinian negotiator.  Suitably chastened, he says, "OK, maybe not. We DEMAND full repatriation of all refugees and their extended families!!"  

          Then the Israeli negotiator says, "We pulled settlers out of Gaza, and we would be willing to do the same in the West Bank if necessary to achieve a lasting peace."  The other half of the auditorium erupts, booing, throwing tomatoes and rubbish at the Israeli team, and one guy even brandishes a gun before he is dragged out by security.  The Israeli, covered in tomato, says "Well, we won the West Bank fair and square in a war started by the Arabs, so it's ours.  And God gave it to us, so its doubly ours. Piss off, we aren't leaving!"

          Private is better.

          In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

          by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Jun 04, 2009 at 02:11:00 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Understood, but this issue and its discussion in (1+ / 0-)
            Recommended by:

            the US could stand a good deal more exposure, imo.  The policy differences between J Street and AIPAC aren't that great, but the method of formulating and implementing that policy is cloaked at the moment.  To negative effect.

            While J Street and the other counters to the status quo will have to work quietly to get full effect, having a visible-to-the-public debate will help illuminate and clarify the issues. Also, such a public discussion shows alternatives that would not be otherwise known given a private lobbying effort.

            Tactically, I think J Street, et. al., can't go toe to toe with an AIPAC in a back room fight.  It's a sure loser.  Public debate puts their ideas out there, letting the public decide, and letting the politicians disagree or use as cover as the case may be.

            The public polling on this issue and the completely opposite policy determinations need to be brought in line.  I don't see how that is done without greater transparency.  

            "Peace be the journey. Cool Runnings!"

            by Terra Mystica on Thu Jun 04, 2009 at 02:59:38 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

      •  Probably the letterhead (0+ / 0-)

        In loving memory: Sophie, June 1, 1993-January 17, 2005. My huckleberry friend.

        by Paul in Berkeley on Thu Jun 04, 2009 at 02:03:21 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Thanks for this (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bigchin, Terra Mystica, rbguy

    I was wondering how to donate to a specific candidate through J Street.

    You should disclose your connections to J Street, if you have any.

  •  rbguy, (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I had hopes for J Street, but it remains entirely unclear to me why any Jew should support an organization that bolsters an anti-Semitic playlike 7 Jewish Children.

    The decision to feature Seven Jewish Children at Theater J should be judged not on the basis of the play’s content but, rather, on its value in sparking a difficult but necessary conversation within our community. To preclude even the possibility of such a discussion does a disservice not only to public discourse, but also to the very values of rigorous intellectual engagement and civil debate on which our community prides itself.

    J Street takes no position on the content of Seven Jewish Children – it is, after all, a play, and not policy.

    IMNSHO, this was a serious mistake.  The play suggests that Jewish people raise their kids to be killers.

    "War does not determine who is right - only who is left." - Bertrand Russell

    by Karmafish on Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 10:32:09 PM PDT

  •  Filner's a good guy (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Terra Mystica, rbguy

    He's not my rep (Susan Davis is), but I've followed his career somewhat since he ran for school board in the late '70s. I went to school with his kids. I haven't always agreed with his approach but I think he is a committed progressive with integrity. I'm glad J Street is supporting him.

    Economic Left/Right: -4.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.82
    A yam.
    What a Yam!
    And that's all that - A yam.

    by AaronInSanDiego on Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 11:09:05 PM PDT

  •  If Edwards is going to be a serious target (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    for her position on our relationship with Israel and the Palestinians, it will make a focused test case for the transition in the power balance described in The Atlantic article.

    "Peace be the journey. Cool Runnings!"

    by Terra Mystica on Thu Jun 04, 2009 at 06:28:16 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site